HUNTURK-ATTILA'S TURANIAN FORUM > For English Speaker Users

1956 HUNGARÝAN REVOLUTÝON(UPRÝSÝNG) AGAÝNST commie scum

<< < (2/2)

TÜRK-KAN:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xY8GlArhxJo

A hősi testvérek Magyarok

Ontottak vért felső a sötét talaj ismét
Ez a nemes vér, a Magyarok
Írt történelem ismét az a legenda, A bátorság,
Hogy hazádért hős, a legszebb módja a halál

A nemzet a verseny épül ezeket a haláleseteket,
Semmilyen módon nem a nemzet Árpád lehet ölni,
Még akkor is,
Ha tart ezer él,

Az állományok Moskof Magyarok azt mutatta,
Hogy a büszkesége Turanizmus úgy halt meg,
Több ezer...
Meghalni nincs elveszíteni, hogy dicsőítsék a hírnév

HEJ Turán. HEJ Bájtarsak. HEJ Turániakat

KUTLUG:


The Hungarian Revolution of 1956 was similarly characterized in the West as the revolt of an oppressed people against a system they had never wanted or liked.

It should therefore have been offered material support by that same West, if it actually believed this was a good thing.

It never came, very little was given, beyond misleading radio broadcasts, lip service, because neither side wanted nuclear war to break out. However the successful uprising was soon crushed, despite this threat, when the West’s bluff was called.

When Britain and France intervened in Suez in 1956 at the same point the fighting stopped in Hungary, what was to stop the Warsaw Pact forces intervening in Hungary?

The West was happy to denounce this as typical of the enemy, but could hardly complain about the principle when they were doing the same thing in Egypt, which they would never be allowed to do back home.

If the world is as split in two between the East and the West as we were told back in the days of Cold War or there is no real difference between the two, except for the willingness of one side to act upon what was said and the unwillingness of the other to admit its hypocrisy?

KAYNAK :VETERANS TODAY

Navigasyon

[0] Mesajlar

[*] Önceki Sayfa